美国亚利桑那作业代写:人权信念冲突

Keywords:美国亚利桑那作业代写

这些措施可以被认为是与一般持有的个人人权信念冲突。国家的措施，以确保，例如，土著少数民族比例民主代表可能需要明确的正面歧视，如“配额”制度，落实到位，严格平等的冲突。文化规范可能会加剧，因此，例如，在一个男权社会，由于本集团的家庭和社会生活的特定部分的社会机制，如妇女，进行群体决策没有声音可能难以行使自己的政治活动和决策权。这种尊重的文化规范就允许不同的个人法律申请例结婚去了哪里，父母离婚，因为他们是在印度，这可以消除女性难以切换到一个不同的领域的人法找到一个更有利的结果的个人选择。此外，这种个人法律可以积极歧视一个或其他性别，例如在拘留的情况下。最后，允许少数民族自己管理自己可能导致对弱势群体的歧视在这个社区–如残疾人、替代性与女性。
美国亚利桑那作业代写:人权信念冲突
Such measures can be considered to come into conflict with generally held beliefs about individual human rights. State measures to ensure, for example, that indigenous minorities have proportional democratic representation may require explicit positive discrimination, such as ‘quota’ systems, to be put in place which conflict with strict equality. Cultural norms may exacerbate this, so that, for example, in a patriarchal society, due to the social mechanics of family and community life particular sections of the group, such as women, are given no voice in group decisions and potentially find it difficult to exercise their right to political activism and decision-making. Where such deference to cultural norms goes as far as permitting different ‘personal laws’ to apply for cases of marriage, parenthood and divorce, as they are in India, this can remove the personal choice of women who find it difficult to switch to a different sphere of personal law to find a more advantageous outcome. Furthermore, such personal laws may actively discriminate against one or other sex, for example in the case of custody. Finally, permitting minorities to govern themselves may result in discrimination against the disadvantaged within that community – such as the disabled, alternative sexualities and women.