美国佛罗里达论文代写:行为主义的政治学
Keywords:美国佛罗里达论文代写:行为主义的政治学
综上所述，虽然一些学者认为行为主义的政治学研究方法有一些毋庸置疑的好处，但是该理论所包含的弱点是无法克服的。本文接受了实证主义的三大认识论批判。首先，它将规范性和形而上学话语边缘化;这妨碍了人们充分理解政治的微妙复杂之处。其次，实证主义在排他性的基础上受到挑战，从而未能认识到生活中社会经济和政治运作所涉及的空间趋势、过程和复杂性。第三，我反对实证主义基于知识的自主性，它人为地将观察者从被观察者中分离出来。行为主义和实证主义之间的内在联系意味着行为主义仍然容易受到实证主义的批判。因此，在此基础上，它破坏了行为主义作为政治学研究的一个适当途径。此外，我拒绝将规律性原则作为行为主义的可信特征。虽然我承认社会存在一定的规律性，但人类和政治的本质在很大程度上是不可预测的，因此不能与自然科学联系在一起。此外，虽然我已经接受了方法论的坑洞和研究者的偏见不仅仅是行为主义所特有的，但我相信它们破坏了行为主义保持客观的基本目标。最后，因为这三个原因，我认为行为主义没有任何真正的有效性作为一个充分的方法来研究政治学。
美国佛罗里达论文代写:行为主义的政治学
In conclusion, although it is contended by certain scholars that there are some undoubted benefits of a behaviourist approach to the study of political science, the weaknesses contained within the theory are insurmountable. This essay accepts the three key epistemological criticisms of positivism. Firstly, that it marginalises normative and metaphysical discourse; this prevents one from fully understanding the subtle intricacies of politics. Secondly, positivism is challenged on the basis of its exclusivity, which thus fails to recognise the spatial trends, processes and intricacies which are involved in socioeconomic and political workings of life. Thirdly, I reject positivism based upon its autonomy of knowledge, which artificially detaches the observer from the observed. This intrinsic relationship between behaviouralism and positivism has meant that behaviouralism remains susceptible to the criticism of positivism. Therefore on this basis it undermines behaviouralism as an adequate approach to the study of political science. Furthermore, I reject the regularities principle as a credible feature of behaviourism. Although I have acknowledged that some regularity exists in society, the nature of mankind and politics is largely unpredictable, and cannot be associated with the natural sciences because of this. In addition, although I have accepted that methodological potholes and researcher bias are not unique to just behaviouralism, I believe that they undermine behaviouralism’s fundamental aim to remain objective. Ultimately, because of these three reasons I believe behavioralism lacks any real validity as an adequate approach to the study of political science.
